Image Height don't work without Width

Hi!
I am putting a line of images that have different sizes and I want to adapt them to the same height.
But I just realized that if I set the height of the image it does not fit, it is mandatory that I check the width to readjust and I think this must be a fault because it needs to be adapted to the height, whatever the width.
Thanks

Comments

  • Hello,
    Indeed, you have to provide two values.
    Also, if you will fill these fields, it will not work as you probably think, because it will resize your image to the closest width and height that you applied - that's because script is made to make the image not distorted.
    Thanks

  • Hi,
    I understand, but putting only the width if it resizes proportionally well.
    By css it does it without problems because it has an auto heigth but if it is recognized, internally, that only the height has been placed, I think it would be very useful if I then used another class where the width of the "auto" would be.
    in my case I want to put a whole row of images with the same height and I can't; I have to calculate manually if internally I had a class for heigth it would solve a very long time.
    I honestly believed it was a bug not a lack of functionality
  • If you would like to use it always to be the same height, you can do it in few ways:
    1) Just cut them in photoshop (or other software) to have them the same height and use the full size option.

    2) Insert the images as a wraps background, insert the divider item with some height applied with Equal Height of Wraps section setting.
    Thanks
  • Hello,
    Yes, there are several ways to do it but since there is the option in the constructor, because to speed up the work as other constructors have, I thought that you had also thought about that. I do not know if you take it into account for future updates.
    Thank you.
  • If you have some ideas for the next updates, please post it here: https://forum.muffingroup.com/betheme/discussion/113/your-suggestions-for-future-updates#latest

    We surely take them into the consideration ;)
    Thanks
Sign In or Register to comment.
This website uses cookies

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services.

Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient.

The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This means that cookies which are categorized as necessary, are processed based on GDPR Art. 6 (1) (f). All other cookies, meaning those from the categories preferences and marketing, are processed based on GDPR Art. 6 (1) (a) GDPR.

This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

You can at any time change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our website.

Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.

Please state your consent ID and date when you contact us regarding your consent.