Compatiblity Betheme with Flyingpress

waldemarker · January 6

Hi, I am switching all websites to Flyingpress and I was wondering not finding BeBuilder and Betheme on the compatibiliy list of Flyingpress.

I am sure that it will work in some way, but maybe you can check it to get a better cooperation?

Fylingpress and FlyingCDN are gamechanger.

https://docs.flyingpress.com/en/articles/11405635-page-builder-theme-and-plugin-integrations

thank you

Waldemar

Phil · January 7

Hi,

Sorry, but we did not test this plugin with the theme. Our policy states that we do not support third-party plugins or custom code, so if you face any problem, you would have to contact the plugin author, as we will not be able to help.

Also, we cannot recommend any plugins other than the ones we support. You can find the list on this page:

https://support.muffingroup.com/documentation/bundled-plugins/#compatibility

Thanks

waldemarker · January 7

Hi Phil,

I meant that could be a quality upgrade if Betheme is on the compatibiliy list of FlyingPress. This caching plugin is surpassing even WP Rocket, a solid plugin. Till now I am using WP Fastest Cache Premium with Betheme, that works already good, but FlyingPress is even better and I will replace it on all 25+ website I handle.

Please speak with your devs or marketing, being Betheme close to be the 2nd most sold in Themeforest, but not visibile on an important professional plugin looks a bit thin.

Phil · January 8

Thanks for the explanation.

I will pass it on, and we will check it out.

Best regards

Phil · January 9

Can you create a testing site with this plugin installed, and send access to it, please?

Thanks to that, we could do some testing and check this plugin closely.

Thanks

waldemarker · January 9

Hi Phil, of course I can do that. Send you the info next week.

I tested it with baustudio.bz.it using Betheme, Performance from 89% to 99% on mobile!

Desktop from 97% to 98%

From = Wp Fastest Cache Premium (which is already good)

To = FlyingPress

Phil · January 9

Thank you. We are waiting for the message from you.

Best regards

waldemarker · January 20

Hi Phil, the website is ready for you, how can I send you access and credentials? e-mail from wordpress?

Waldemar

Phil · January 21

Please send us the WordPress dashboard and FTP access privately through the contact form, which is on the right side at https://themeforest.net/user/muffingroup#contact and we will check that.

Notice!

Please attach a link to this forum discussion.

Sending incorrect or incomplete data will result in a longer response time.

Therefore, please ensure that the data you send are complete and correct.

Thanks

waldemarker · January 21

done

Phil · January 22

I received your private message, but it contains a link and username only, missing all other information we need.

Please send another message with complete data.

Thanks

waldemarker · January 22

yes I send a 2nd message with the password separately (but with the same link to this discussion)

Phil · January 22

I have not received a second message from the person who manages the mailbox.

Could you resend it, please?

Thanks

waldemarker · January 22

done

Phil · January 22

Have you already configured this plugin on the website you sent access to?

I have checked that with GTmetrix and PageSpeed Insights, and checked the results:

with plugin active

after I disabled it

In GTmetrix, there is a slight difference, but smaller than what you showed in the screenshot. Anyway, there is a huge difference in PageSpeed Insights in favor of the website without this plugin.

With such results, at the moment, we are rather far from calling this a "game changer" and a better plugin than, e.g., WPRocket.

Maybe we are missing some crucial point of that, or a configuration that makes this big difference. We would be happy if you could elaborate on that.

Thanks

waldemarker · January 23

Hi Phil, thank you for the testing. I have tested a lot of websites and with gtmetrix the result was quite clear, every time using the plugin it was huge better, specially on mobile.

Pagespeed Insigts are unreliable and variable, testing 2-3 times with the same settings get different results. I got 56 with and 69 without plugin like you, but afterwards I got 55 without plugin and 68 with plugin – the opposite! So I cannot use that as a real reliable number.

I checked betheme speed settings, but they are all off.

Phil · January 23

Do not you have any cache on your server?

This might be the reason why results vary so much.

Can you verify it, please? If there is any cache on the server, please disable it, so we can recheck that.

Best regards

waldemarker · January 23

There is OPcache active on the Apache Server, but usually gtmetrix, pingdom, keycdn do not vary so much as Google Insights

Phil · January 23

We do not have direct influence over the various testing algorithms used by different tools.

We primarily rely on Google PageSpeed Insights for our optimizations for two main reasons:

Comprehensive Diagnostics: It provides highly detailed technical feedback, which allows for much deeper troubleshooting and fine-tuning.
SEO and Ranking: Ultimately, Google uses these metrics to evaluate your website. Since these scores can directly impact your search engine positioning, we treat PSI as the primary benchmark to ensure our users get the best possible results where it matters most.

While we always aim for broad compatibility with optimization plugins, focusing on Google’s own standards ensures the best long-term outcomes for site visibility and performance.

Best regards

waldemarker · January 29

Hi Phil, the good news is, that Betheme has already a good score for all tools.

Compatiblity Betheme with Flyingpress

Comments

This website uses cookies